<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 Shot Burst #3: Top 3 Online proofing sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobomediainc.com/2009/05/22/3-shot-burst-3-top-3-online-proofing-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobomediainc.com/2009/05/22/3-shot-burst-3-top-3-online-proofing-sites/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 02:00:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Proofing made easy with Conceptshare! &#124; Mobo Media, Inc</title>
		<link>http://www.mobomediainc.com/2009/05/22/3-shot-burst-3-top-3-online-proofing-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1315</link>
		<dc:creator>Proofing made easy with Conceptshare! &#124; Mobo Media, Inc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobomediainc.com/?p=396#comment-1315</guid>
		<description>[...] one of our previous posts, we reviewed the Conceptshare system. The above video is a quick run through highlighting some of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one of our previous posts, we reviewed the Conceptshare system. The above video is a quick run through highlighting some of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.mobomediainc.com/2009/05/22/3-shot-burst-3-top-3-online-proofing-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1233</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 06:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobomediainc.com/?p=396#comment-1233</guid>
		<description>I have used almost every proofing application on the web be it Proofhq, Conceptshare or ProofHub.Proofhq is easy to use but sharing becomes difficult if u are not using Basecamp.

Personally for quick and easy reviews i find ProofHub the best. Give it a try. 
Here it is: http://www.proofhub.com/mini</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used almost every proofing application on the web be it Proofhq, Conceptshare or ProofHub.Proofhq is easy to use but sharing becomes difficult if u are not using Basecamp.</p>
<p>Personally for quick and easy reviews i find ProofHub the best. Give it a try.<br />
Here it is: <a href="http://www.proofhub.com/mini" rel="nofollow">http://www.proofhub.com/mini</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.mobomediainc.com/2009/05/22/3-shot-burst-3-top-3-online-proofing-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobomediainc.com/?p=396#comment-871</guid>
		<description>Hi, we have one called Apollo! :)

It is free and lightweight, and tries to get out of your way rather than provide every feature you might want. 

We are looking for feedback on what designers might want before we implement the next wave of features.

If you are interested in giving it a go, sign up at www.useapollo.com and let us know what you think! 

-Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, we have one called Apollo! <img src='http://www.mobomediainc.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It is free and lightweight, and tries to get out of your way rather than provide every feature you might want. </p>
<p>We are looking for feedback on what designers might want before we implement the next wave of features.</p>
<p>If you are interested in giving it a go, sign up at <a href="http://www.useapollo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.useapollo.com</a> and let us know what you think! </p>
<p>-Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sart</title>
		<link>http://www.mobomediainc.com/2009/05/22/3-shot-burst-3-top-3-online-proofing-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Sart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobomediainc.com/?p=396#comment-127</guid>
		<description>I have just tested the three systems.

In my view Creationflow is inferior to both ProofHQ and Conceptshare from a usability perspective.  Conceptshare has a nice GUI for designers, but ProofHQ is much better for getting clients to understand how to review a design.

Also, I tested a high quality PDF brochure (22MB).  ProofHQ was the only one of the three that displayed the proof to a high standard and loaded quickly.  Creationflow was really shocking at a high zoom.  Conceptshare wasn&#039;t much better.

Conceptshare does screenshot capture and I had to upload a screenshot to the other two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just tested the three systems.</p>
<p>In my view Creationflow is inferior to both ProofHQ and Conceptshare from a usability perspective.  Conceptshare has a nice GUI for designers, but ProofHQ is much better for getting clients to understand how to review a design.</p>
<p>Also, I tested a high quality PDF brochure (22MB).  ProofHQ was the only one of the three that displayed the proof to a high standard and loaded quickly.  Creationflow was really shocking at a high zoom.  Conceptshare wasn&#8217;t much better.</p>
<p>Conceptshare does screenshot capture and I had to upload a screenshot to the other two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
